Liquidity, contract control, sellability and the LP lock of one token, as figures. Nothing is combined into a score, and what was not observed is named.
How this calculation works — the formula, its inputs, what it assumes, and what it does not establish.
Read what can actually be observed about a token right now, as figures: its pool liquidity against its market cap, the share of its LP supply that is burned or locked, whether the contract still carries mint or owner privileges, and whether it can be sold. Nothing is combined into a score. A figure no provider reported is shown as not reported, and it is not counted for or against the token.
A provider that did not answer has told us nothing, and an absent answer is not evidence about the token. A check nobody reported is shown as not reported and is kept out of the count, so a provider outage cannot be mistaken for evidence about a token. Each figure that was observed is stated with its own number beside it, so the reader sees exactly what was read.
A single number would add up figures measured on different scales and hide which of them moved it. The LP lock is stated as the share of the LP supply that is burned or in a time lock that has not expired, and one line says whether that share is more or less than half. That line is a count, not a verdict on the token.
They are not a safety check, and no arrangement of them establishes that a token is safe to buy. A time lock can expire, verified source code can still be hostile, and an absent owner privilege today says nothing about an upgradeable proxy tomorrow. The figures describe the evidence available at one moment, with each part of it named.
Liquidity, lock state and contract control of a token as figures. Unobserved items are named, not assumed. MoonMath labels the data basis for this tool as Observed, Formula.
No. The Token Launch Quality Check is an educational scenario tool, not financial advice, a recommendation, or a forecast. Provider coverage, liquidity, routing, fees and market conditions can make real outcomes materially different.
Because a provider that did not answer has reported nothing, and an absent answer is not evidence about the token. The figure is shown as not reported and is not counted for or against the token, so a provider outage cannot be mistaken for evidence about it.
No. The figures reflect what could be observed at one moment about liquidity, lock state, contract control and sellability. A lock can expire, verified code can still be hostile, and no combination of these figures establishes that buying is safe.