Adding liquidity versus buying
A balanced liquidity deposit supplies both pool assets at the current reserve ratio. It is not equivalent to buying the token and should not be modeled as directional price pressure.
How does changing liquidity affect the pool? This BSC analysis uses observed token and pool evidence where available, keeps assumptions visible and does not present a recommendation or forecast. Current observed price is $1.88 with $16,514,626.77 reported pool liquidity.
Every calculator's reading of this token on one page: price impact, pool depth, holders and the on-chain holder analysis.
Open the reportPool depth stands at $16,514,627, which is 2.42% of the $683,828,682 capitalisation it has to support.
A day's reported trading of $7,900,702 turns that depth over 0.48×.
Against it, a reference sale of 1% of supply marked at $6,838,287 realises about $3,731,093 — 45.44% lost to the curve.
Depth here means 30 constant-product pools at 100.00% coverage, and nothing observed was left out.
Only included constant-product pool estimates are executable in this model. CEX order-book depth and unsupported or concentrated-liquidity pools are not merged into AMM reserves.
Simulate liquidity changes, calculate impermanent loss, and measure pool depth and activity for crypto token pools.
How this calculation works — the formula, its inputs, what it assumes, and what it does not establish.
Simulate how adding or removing balanced AMM liquidity changes pool reserves and execution depth. Balanced liquidity changes tradable depth without mechanically changing the current pool price.
A balanced liquidity deposit supplies both pool assets at the current reserve ratio. It is not equivalent to buying the token and should not be modeled as directional price pressure.
A given swap represents a smaller fraction of a deeper pool. That generally produces less curve movement and better execution for the same trade size.
The simulator models a constant-product pool. Concentrated liquidity, order books, multiple pools and changing external prices require different execution models.
Simulate reserve changes and price impact using constant-product pool mathematics. MoonMath labels the data basis for this tool as Observed, Formula, Model.
No. The Liquidity Impact Simulator is an educational scenario tool, not financial advice, a recommendation, or a forecast. Provider coverage, liquidity, routing, fees and market conditions can make real outcomes materially different.
No. When assets are added at the current pool ratio, reserves grow while the reserve ratio and spot price remain unchanged.