What liquidity removal changes
Proportional removal reduces both reserves while preserving their ratio at that moment. The spot price can remain unchanged even though the pool becomes easier to move.
See how the same sale changes when pool liquidity is removed.
Fills the pool figures below from live market data. Every field stays editable — a pool you are only imagining is a valid thing to test.
Total value currently available in the pool.
The same sale is tested before and after removal.
How much pool liquidity disappears. Starts at 50%: a stated midpoint, not an observation of any pool.
Price before liquidity is removed.
Usually 0.30% for a V2-style pool.
Your comparison will appear here
How this calculation works — the formula, its inputs, what it assumes, and what it does not establish.
Stress-test how the same token sale executes after part of a constant-product pool's balanced liquidity is removed. Lower depth increases price impact even when spot price initially remains unchanged.
Proportional removal reduces both reserves while preserving their ratio at that moment. The spot price can remain unchanged even though the pool becomes easier to move.
After liquidity is removed, a sale consumes a larger share of token-side depth and travels farther along the AMM curve, reducing average execution price.
The selected removal percentage is a scenario. The calculator does not predict whether a provider will remove liquidity or how arbitrage and other venues will respond.
Stress-test tradable depth and execution after a chosen share of liquidity disappears. MoonMath labels the data basis for this tool as Observed, Formula, Model.
No. The Liquidity Removal Stress Test is an educational scenario tool, not financial advice, a recommendation, or a forecast. Provider coverage, liquidity, routing, fees and market conditions can make real outcomes materially different.
Yes. Proportional removal preserves the reserve ratio, but leaves less depth and worsens execution for later trades.